DECEIVING THE INFIDEL AND OTHER MATTERS

The following was written by RiteOn Guest Editor E.G......
(Note: Written as a response to comments made by another member of the "discussion group" that EG participates with. You can see more writing from this group by going to Stephen Browne's blog at http://rantsand.blogspot.com....  Ed.)
*******************************
I believe Arab/Islamic culture considers deceiving “the Infidel” as acceptable, so why would any intelligent being believe we can “negotiate” with those whose very idea of negotiation is to deceive? This is what makes Obama so dangerous. He’s arrogant and uninformed (a deadly combination).  Achmadinijad would be schmoozing him with butter tea and singing his praises (which makes his head swell alarmingly) while planning on nuking Tel Aviv. The North Koreans did the same thing to Bill Clinton (and to some extent to George Bush).

Incidentally, will the nuclear physicists on the board (the “discussion” group) educate me. One of the posters—forget who—lamented that Israelis nuking Tehran would be a bad thing because it would spread radiation both east and westward --  the “On the Beach” scenario. So why wouldn’t Iranians nuking Tel Aviv be the same dire happening? Or is nuking Jews okay because they’re Jews? Iran has openly stated destroying Israel is their intent in the future and they’re madly refining uranium. So who doesn’t think it’s for a bomb?(... read on)

...Regarding the Israelis giving the Palestinians a “patch of desert”—all of Israel was a “patch of desert” when the land was partitioned. Israel transformed their patch; Palestinians continued to (and still do) scrub for handouts from “enlightened” Western nations and use the money to blow up Jews. (Frankly, I think when they’re done with the Jews, they’ll start on the Christians. From what I understand the Christian population in Bethlehem is rapidly disappearing since Israel turned it over to the Palestinians. So Christ’s birthplace is now in Moslem hands again. How is that better than being in Jewish hands? What if some radical element decides to blow it up the way they blew up the Buddhist statues in Afghanistan? Can’t happen? It did.)

Nor is War the answer. Iraq was and is a boondoggle. First of all, Saddam was killing Muslims, not Americans. Muslims killing Muslims (and everyone else) has a long history. They are a violent psychosexual cult and have been at murder in the name of religion since Mohammad started beheading pagans who refused to convert. His adherents are still at it if the videos are to be believed.

Furthermore, there is no proof Saddam had anything to do with 9-11 whatsoever. Frankly, he’s one I would have negotiated with because I think he hated Iran more than he hated the West. He kept Iran in check. Taking him out was a big mistake. That said, it’s done, we’re there, and leaving without victory will send another message to the radicals that we are as bin Laden claims—too soft for war.

DF (Another member of the discussion group) claims American weakness was not the cause of 9/11. Sorry, but when a terrorist group attacks a nation every eighteen months for eight years without paying any consequence, that is weakness. So far as 9-11 being a scar on our psyche, most Americans rarely think of it except when reminded, and that isn’t often. Our media have done such a wonderful job of spiking it, the Chinese just announced they’ve discovered a new tree.  People jumping to their deaths from burning buildings was considered too painful for Americans to see, so we rarely see any pictures of 9-11. Besides, showing 9-11 reminds us why we fight, so (it) helps George Bush (and now John McCain) and the media here function mainly as the propaganda wing of the DNC—just as Soviet media functioned as the Soviets’ propagandists. They want the Obamessiah (as some wags call him).

So what is the answer? I personally believe divorce and separation. Our Constitution prohibits deportation of those born here, so America needs to be sure few if any Moslems are born here, i.e. totally restrict immigration of Muslims and deport those who are not citizens, naturalized or native. No student visas, no work permits, no Muslims. Perhaps, after and if they have a renaissance, the restrictions can be lifted. Not until.

As far as the NHS, DF is right: One operation does not an argument make.  In the interest of time, I only mentioned one and that was in the context of describing Ben Carson who donated his surgical skills gratis to save the little boy. I have a whole list of others, however, but DF precluded my listing them when he stated he has private insurance.

DF’s idea of situating the UN on the Falklands is a stroke of genius (and I am neither kidding nor being sarcastic.) I’d prefer Ghana or Zimbabwe or maybe Iran, but the Falklands would do just fine. I just want them out of the USA where they enjoy the luxury of our culture while undermining it every chance they get.

EG