It would seem from various sources of information that government agencies of all kinds are using drones to spy on PRIVATE citizen's activities, even down to how they manage their personal property. If they aren't doing this they certainly have the capacity to do it...and that means, under Obama (or Hillary)... In time...they will.
The temptation to use EVERY means to control people and their activities through the gathering of private information is the hallmark of every previous and current control freak, in or out of government or the media. Where the radicals in control of the Democrat Party are going is obvious! This alone should show us what the Obama Administration's ultimate objective is and one wonders why people (except for a relative few) seem so naive and unconcerned about it.
Here's a link that illustrates PART of the problem.
We say PART of it because we really don't know what the historically non-transparent Obama Administration is actually doing with today's advanced technology (or anything else) they have under their control. Considering the unlimited taxpayer funding now provided by Congress, legislation that might protect citizens is waaaaay behind reality in this instance and with the Senate controlled by the Democrats and the White House controlled by an individual who believes he does not need to answer to Congress (or anyone else) and can ignore whatever parts of the Constitution he finds "inconvenient" there is little chance of maintaining even Constitutionally protected personal privacy should you become "a person or organization of interest!" Nobody but the most pro-Obama zealot could dispute this after watching and listening to the attempts to cover up and lie about events and the stonewalling that is currently in full view coming from the Obama Administration, its zealots, appointees and agencies.
Under present circumstances, personal security should be a primary objective for every citizen. There are ways of mitigating (but not 100%) one's exposure to government agencies that would attempt to legally or illegally, gather comprehensive information about its citizens and violate the privacy insured by the Constitution. The most obvious is to shut off whatever devices people use that can be electronically interrogated without their knowledge. The most obvious and widely used of these is a "smartphone" and all devices that operate using a similar technology. Return to a voice-communications-only type phone, for instance. But even calls using voice-only devices can be monitored and traced...just not as completely as "smartphone" communications can. The tracking ability of "smartphone" devices can be disconnected but then a lot of the "apps" become worthless too and the reason for having the devices at all may become moot. For most this will be difficult, as the society has trapped us into depending on advanced electronic devices to conduct daily business.
In conversations we have had with those who sell encryption programs, they admit, after much questioning, that they have been forced to provide "back door access" to government representatives. We believe the Patriot Act requires divulging certain information to government "navigator-like" people WITHOUT A WARRANT or demonstrating "reasonable" cause. This renders the encryption worthless for maintaining ADEQUATE privacy of communications, passwords, etc. That method of individual protection has apparently been rendered ineffective by "government interpretation." Of course, the primary reason given for requesting this authority is so government agencies can track terrorist activities, etc. There is a reasonable argument on the other side of this and it should be explored fully in public hearings concerning future legislation.
Perhaps we can see why the Tea Party, Patriot organizations, etc, are nearly always included in comments when the government's broad definition of what are terrorist groups is passed out to the media and used by liberal politicians as talking points! Maybe this is the reason why the Obama Administration's zealots repeatedly define the Tea Party and Patriot organizations as "terrorist" groups.
This isn't a new realization (Hitler, advised by his Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels), successfully brainwashed an entire nation...the use of brute force helped, of course. Others have also. One aspect of total control of any society and its citizens is to either brainwash or bully the public into believing that certain opposing organizations and individuals can legitimately be attacked, spied on, refused their 1st Amendment rights and mistreated by government agencies like the NSA, IRS, EPA, etc.
It goes almost without saying that some of the thoughts previously stated will be regarded by many as "extreme" and we grant that with regard to national security there are reasonable arguments for and against that view. However, in looking at the facts and the circumstances of the Obama Administration and its various agents, sympathizers and supporters (including the major media) our observations lead us to believe that something akin to a total takeover of American society may be under way. Should not a circumstance of such momentous importance be a topic of serious discussion by many who are not currently engaged? If we are going to become a socialist, communist, fascist or banana republic society (Some say we are FAR beyond that now), and abandon the protections of our Constitution by allowing government to completely dominate our lives, shouldn't we at least be focused on what is happening? We believe we should.